Use of Articles on This Website

Feel free to use any of these articles on your website, blog, or newsletter. Just be sure not to change it, or take credit for it as your own. If you do use it, give credit to this site and please put a link back to www.truthofwater.com

Search For:

Custom Search

Categories

Technorati

Add to Technorati Favorites
Reference Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Resources Blogs - Blog Top Sites
  • 30Nov

    Joanne from Australia Writes:

    We just bought a house thats about 50 years old.  The water has a faint brown colour.  I think the pipes may be rusty.  Is it a health hazard to drink and cook with this water.  I mean by giving us cancer etc

    Hi Joanne, thanks for writing in.

    If your water has a brownish or reddish colour to it, this could indeed be rust.  To find out for sure, put this water into a clear glass and let it sit for a few hours.  If the water clears and you see some sediment or a film at the bottom of your glass, this is oxidized iron.

    This rust can come from several places.  It can come from older galvanized steel piping.  If you have municipal water, it is common to get some discoloured water when the water operations staff do routine flushing of the pipes.  This should go away very shortly.

    If you have a well, the colour could be coming from an iron well casing, or from the water itself. It is very common for ground water to have dissolved iron in it, and as you pump it you add oxygen to the water, oxidizing the iron into insoluable form and causing the discolouration.

    A small bit of oxidized iron is not bad for you.  Your body uses this naturally occurring mineral. The only concerns are aesthetic, as no one wants to cook with or drink coloured water.

    Often with older piping or wells if the water has not been used for a siginificant period of time this can lead to leaching the iron. Try running all of your taps for 10 or 20 minutes each.

    A sediment filter can also remove the rust, and these are available inexpesively at your local hardware store.

    I hope I’ve answered your question to your satisfaction. If you have any more questions or require further clarification, do not hesitate to write in again.

    Share This Post

    Tags: , ,

  • 22Nov

    Pat from San Diego, California writes:

    I am fearful of drinking our tap water, as I have been hearing of the dangers of mercury in our water and its proliferation due to the Bush policies that have encouraged polluters to increase its concentration. But the last straw was when our local county boards started adding fluoride to our water. It was then that I started buying bottled water for all of our drinking needs.

    Could you please tell me where I could take my drinking water for testing of these 2 pollutants?
    Could you discuss what type of water treatment could be relied upon to remove mercury and fluoride?
    I was very hopeful about buying a steam-condensing system and then I read your comments about distilled water (I presume that’s what such a system produces) and now I am fearful of distilled water too.

    Hi Pat, thank you for your question.

    I’d like to address fluoride first.  Fluoride is an interesting chemical and has been the source of much debate among water purveyors and health professionals. While it is considered a toxic chemical in it’s concentrated forms, in trace amounts it is actually beneficial for the health and strength of teeth.  Typically, water supplies that do not have a high enough naturally occurring fluoride concentration have been fluoridated to compensate for this.  The argument is whether this is needed or not, as some feel there is enough fluoride in tooth paste and food items to provide for the bodies need for trace amounts of fluoride.  The trace amounts of fluoride in your water will not harm you. In fact, you should check the label of the bottled water you have been using. Often, bottled water will contain as much or more fluoride as your tap waters.

    I understand your concern of mercury. This contaminant is a dangerous one, and no doubt you have heard of Minimata Japan, where Minimata disease was first found, which is mercury poisoning.  While mercury in your water supply is something to be concerned about, you should be much more concerned about mercury poisoning in fish.

    When mercury enters a water supply, microbes can convert it to an organic form of mercury.  Larger animals eat these microbes, and so on and so forth up the food chain in a process called biological magnification. This biological magnification causes a significant amount of mercury to be bound up in the muscle tissue of fish, who do not have the same capacity to remove trace mercury from their systems as mammals do.

    Under the United States EPA, municipal water purveyors are required to test for mercury at a regular basis.  If they detect a level above 2 parts per billion, they are then required to impliment measures to remove it as well.

    Just to let you know, bottled water retailers are under no such regulation and can bottle anything they want.

    Tap water is your safest alternative.  Most people do not realize just how regulated municipal water is. In addition, those who sell home water products use fear mongering techniques to instill the unwarranted fear that tap water is not safe.

    The municipality I work in has a policy of full disclosure.  We provide detailed records of all water tests on our website, and will provide them upon request.  Please do not hesitate to contact your municipality, they will be most likely be more than happy to provide test results on concentrations of mercury and fluoride.

    If you still would like to test your water for contaminants at your own expense, contact the USEPA. They will be able to guide you to the closest licensed laboratory for drinking water testing. It is important to use a licensed lab, as they have met minimum quality guidelines.

    Finally, please refer to this article on about.com:chemistry. It gives some useful tips about reducing fluoride from your diet from water as well as sources that are not from drinking water.

    I hope I’ve answered your question to your satisfaction.  If you have any other questions, or need further clarification, please do not hesitate to write in again.

    Share This Post

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 21Nov

    Sylvian from Orlando, Florida writes:

    Should I treat my tap water? I was going to buy a water ionizer machine, but after reading your site, I won\’t buy it now. But what about a product called “RAINSOFT”? It’s a whole house water treatment/purification system which has a brine filter tank and an external salt pellet tank. Is this a scam too? What do you suggest I do? Should I simply drink tap water???

    Hi Sylvian, thanks for writing in.

    Very simply, here in North America municipally treated tap water is safe to drink.  The regulations are strict and much time and money is spent ensuring the public water supplies will do no harm.

    Unfortunately, many water treatment companies rely on fear mongering tactics to sell more home water treatment equipment.  If a company that sells home water treatment equipment tells you that your municipally treated tap water will kill you or harm you in anyway, don’t believe them.  Much of these claims are based on half truths associated with treated water.  For example, while it is true that there is a potential for chlorinated water supplies to form carcinogenic compounds, it is not true that they will always be in your drinking water.  It’s also not true that municipalities don’t know/care about any of these things.  Some companies go so far as to say they are not tested for, which is completely untrue.

    Municipal drinking water goes through a gambit of testing on a regular basis not only to ensure the water is free from harmful pathogens, but that is it contains less than the maximum allowable concentration of potentially harmful chemicals, both from natural water supplies and potentialy produced from the water treatment process.

    All maximum allowable concentrations of chemicals are continuously under review by water treatment, health and government officials.

    The bottom line is the quality of your drinking water is produced and monitored by people who are more qualified than any employee of a home water treatment store. And unlike some of these private treatment equipment sales organizations, the only ulterior motive water treatment professionals have is to ensure your water is safe to drink.

    Now that you know that tap water is safe to drink, you can shop for water treatment devices without being lead astray by over zealous sales people looking only for more money.

    If this Rainsoft product uses salt, it is an ion exchange unit designed to soften water.  While this will improve lathering and reduce the need for soap, it also adds sodium to your water, making it less healthy to drink.

    Other considerations for aethetics are taste.  Carbon filters are available that removes the trace amounts of chlorine in your tap water and makes it more palitable but remember: change your filter often as carbon filters can be a place where bacteria can accumulate and grow.

    I hope this has answered your question. Please write in again if you need further clarification or have another question.

    Share This Post

    Tags: , ,

  • 19Nov

    Anyone who is on their own water supply at home invariably has – or should, take samples to be tested for bacteria on a regular basis. Taken on a quarterly basis, this kind of check keeps tabs on the effectiveness of a water treatment system and/or the quality of your water supply.

    We live in a bacteria world. There is bacteria on us, in us, and all around us. The technique you use for sampling your home has a huge effect on the reliability of the results. You need to sample in such a manner as to exclude outside interferences.

    Sample location is one of the most important considerations. It is better to choose an area that’s kept clean of dirt and clutter on a regular basis, such as a kitchen tap. This is a better choice than say a basement laundry room tub that probably has years of accumulated dirt, grime and grease.

    The type of tap is important too. The best tap to take a sample from is one that has separate hot/cold faucet handles, rather than one hot/cold faucet handle. The latter uses a mixer valve, and over time those mixer valves can leak hot water into the cold water side, even when not asking for hot water. Hot water tanks and heaters tend to grow bacteria, so could skew your results.

    Make sure you run your water for at least two minutes. You want to make sure that your water is fresh, clean water, and not stagnant water that has been sitting in your pipes for some time.

    Before you take your sample, remove your aerator. Aerators can collect sediment which can harbor bacteria. Filling your sample bottle, turn your water off. Heat up the tip of your tap with a propane torch, just until you hear a squelching noise when the water is turned back on. This will kill any bacteria that is on the surface of your tap from daily activities that will skew your result.

    Finally, make sure you inspect your sample bottle. Bottles should come from your lab or health unit pre sealed and steralized. Give your bottle a squeeze. If air enters or escapes, throw the bottle out and get another one. When you are sampling, take the cap off carefully. Do not touch the inside of the cap, don’t put it down, and make sure that you hold the cap in such a manner (downwards), so nothing can fall into it.

    When submitting your sample, use a small cooler and ice pack. Most laboratories prefer it at refridgerator temperature.   This is to ensure that if there is any bacteria in the sample, it will not grow while in transit, skewing the results.

    Follow these simple steps when taking your bacteria samples, and you can be sure that you’ll have accurate results.

    Share This Post

    Tags: , , ,

  • 17Nov

    Pau from California left a comment on the article Electronic Water Softeners – Misconception and Misdirection posted on November 10th.  He writes:

    The environmental issue with water softeners is not their effect on septic tanks, but the amount of water they waste and the effect of chloride on reclaimed water and agriculture. Do you realize that the Canandian WQA is the trade group for the softener industry? Cities and counties in Califoria have rebate programs to remover softeners (San Bernadino) and one city has succefully passed a law to have them removed (Santa Clarita) See the news article. http://www.wwdmag.com/California-Voters-Approve-Santa-Clarita-Softener-Ban-newsPiece17017.

    Even if the water to the sink is by-passed so it is not softened, what about the water in other faucets and the water that you shower in.
    Water softeners are not healthy and are bad for the environment.

    Thank you for leaving the comment, Pau.

    It is true that no one needs a water softener.  Hard water is an aesthetic concern only, and indeed does have health benefits to the user in the form of higher levels of needed minerals.  I encourage anyone who is considering having a softener installed instead purchase more soap, and live with hard water.

    California must have very hard water for the softeners to have that high of an effect on chlorides in natural water tables.  I do not know much of the hydrogeology of California.  I do understand that the water tables in most of the United States have dropped significantly, concentrating much of the naturally occuring (and some not so naturally occuring) contaminants in the water.

    I am familiar with the hydrogeology where I’m from.  The majority of chlorides and sodium come from the practice of road salting. Indeed, one of our well sites is experiencing elevated sodium that can be traced directly back to a salt storage yard upstream of it.  We have corrected that by building a new and leak proof storage shed.

    I do agree that softeners are a waste of water, due to their regeneration cycles.  I would comment though, that the way we use water in general is wasteful.  Our bathing practices, washing practices and industrial use of water is very high.  Even our low flow toilets use three times more water in one flush than the average third world African does in a day.

    In closing, I agree that there is no need for water softeners.  I would argue that stopping the use of water softeners is only a small step to reducing water waste and contamination of water supplies, but it is a step in the right direction.

    Share This Post

    Tags: , ,

« Previous Entries   Next Entries »

Recent Comments

  • hu i think you r right bcause iam doing research on this RO...
  • The sodium in drinking water is not a medical problem. We g...
  • Thanks for the info. I am just curios when you said that...
  • We replaced all the gal pipes with copper and guess what?? ...
  • I would disagree with the advice given to Nadia on this post...